Dynamic equivalence theory and film adaptation by sarah welch faculty advisor, dr. Equivalence and translation strategies by charlotte hedar on. Nida s formal and dynamic equivalence translation nida argued that there are two different types of equivalence, namely formal equivalence and dynamic equivalence. Nida is secretary for translations, the american bible society. They liken this new method of translation to the pearl of great price and acknowledge that once an individual finds the supposed value of this method he tends to leave all other translations in favor of the newly. International journal of english and education issn. How far should a bible translator go in adapting the message to the language and the culture of the receptors. The difference between literal and dynamic translations of. Against the theory of dynamic equivalence by michael marlowe revised and expanded, january 2012. Formal and dynamic equivalence and the principle of. Eugene albert nida, 44th president of the linguistic society of america, died on august 25, 2011, at the age of ninetysix in madrid, spain. Formal equivalence the attention is on the message, both in form and content. Nidas translation theory of dynamic equivalence and initiates a comparative study of dynamic equivalence and formal. Study of nida s formal and dynamic equivalence translating approach on a literary piece of text.
The present study aimed to investigate which of these approaches are the main focuses of the translators in the translations of the two short stories. The translation has been defined on the basis that the receptors of a translation should comprehend the translated text to such all extent that they call understand how the original receptors must have. Formal equivalence definition and meaning collins english. Bible translation, concordance of terminology, dynamic equivalence, formal equivalence, gloss translation, linguistic and cultural distance in translation, natural translation, poetry translation, principle of equivalent effect 1.
Dynamic and formal equivalence synonyms, dynamic and formal equivalence pronunciation, dynamic and formal equivalence translation, english dictionary definition of dynamic and formal equivalence. In the complementary relationship, paradigm and syntagma combine to. Jeffrey keuss a project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the university scholars program seattle pacific university 2014. Nidas translation theory of dynamic equivalence and initiates a. My purpose here is to illustrate and to critically examine how eugene nida applied principles of dynamic equivalence in his books, by using an example given in his book the theory and practice of translation leiden. Formal correspondence focuses attention on the message itself,in both form and content, unlike dynamic equivalence. In figure 1, however, we are trying to point out what would be the ideal amount of formal equivalence in a translation and this would be equivalent to a dynamicequivalence translation. The latter two are dynamic equivalent translations.
An ethnotheological approach to indigeneity charles h. Pdf terminological equivalence in legal translation. Nida was born in oklahoma city on november 11, 1914. Jan 22, 2014 eugene nida was best known, however, for the dynamic equivalence principle of scripture translation what has become the operational principle of every major translation agency in the world. Aug 25, 2011 eugene nida, the father of the dynamic equivalence bible translation philosophy, has passed away at age 96. Conclusion all in all, dynamic equivalence translation principle might not suitable for all styles and in every situation, and for genre of poetry that emphasize a lot on forms, formal equivalence principle is more suitable than dynamic equivalence principle. Apr 03, 2014 two basic orientations in translating formal equivalence dynamic equivalence 9. Eugene nida formal correspondence in translation 1970. Oct 05, 2004 their goal is ultimately to replace the older formal equivalence versions with the dynamic equivalence paraphrases. Formal equivalence is thus the quality of a translation in which the features of the form of the source text have been mechanically reproduced in the receptor language. Dynamic and formal equivalence definition of dynamic and. View nida s dynamic equivalence research papers on academia.
It should studiously avoid translationese formal fidelity, with resulting. Anyone who regularly reads the niv would be well advised to also read one or more of the more literal translations to give a clearer picture of what the holy spirit inspired the original authors to write. Equivalence in the vietnamese translation of shakespeares romeo and juliet. On describing similarity and measuring equivalence in. Dynamic equivalence and formal correspondence in translation. Chapter 1 eugene nida dynamic equivalence and formal equivalence eugenenida dynamic equivalence formalequivalence guided reading eugene distinguished,american translation theorist linguist. Nida s model of translation is closely related to dynamic equivalence and formal equivalence. Oct 05, 2009 the terms dynamic equivalence and formal equivalence mask the fact that at least two distinct theoretical issues separate most translations. The nature of dynamic equivalence in translating eric. Chapter 1 eugene nida dynamic equivalence and formal.
Kraft since the days of rufus anderson and henry venn in the middle of the nineteenth century, the concept of indigeneity has gained greater and greater prominence as an if not always the only ideal of much of western missionary activity. Contextual consistency over verbal consistency dynamic equivalence over formal correspondence the aural form over the written form form which are understandable to audience over traditionally more prestigious ones. Nida s functional equivalence in order to achieve passage equivalence. While nidas claims on the priority of dynamic equivalence over formal correspondence have been widely. Th e limits of dynamic equivalence the limits of dynamic. In particular, nida argues that in formal equivalence the tt resembles very much the st in both form and content whereas in dynamic equivalence an effort is made to convey the st message in the tt as. These translations are generally less literal on a wordforword basis but still seek to capture the meaning of the originallanguage texts. In this, translator focuses more on the culture and linguistics expression. On the implausibility of equivalent response part i erudit. Nidas dynamic equivalence in the context of bib le translation trig. The terms dynamic equivalence and formal equivalence, coined by eugene nida, are associated with two dissimilar translation approaches that are employed to achieve different levels of literalness between the source text and the target text, as evidenced in biblical translation.
Among bible scholars there is a school which is always inquiring into the genres or rhetorical forms of speech represented in any given passage of the bible, and also the social settings which are supposed to be connected with these forms. A crucial question constantly confronts all bible translators. Thus, the more literal the translation is, the less danger there is of. Dynamic equivalence or functional equivalence conveys the essential thoughts expressed in a source text. Nida observed that wordbyword translations result in grammatical inconsistencies and errors in understanding. Hence, this paper sets out to revisit nida and explain in detail what his theoretical. Dynamic and formal equivalence are concepts from linguistics when a language is translated into another one, there is a problem. Whats more, nida and newmark combine theory with practice. The limits of dynamic equivalence in bible translation which a translation is intended have priority over forms that may be traditionally more prestigious. Nidas perspective and beyond dohun kim translation is an interlingual and intercultural communication, in which correspondence at the level of formal and meaningful structures does not necessarily lead to a successful communication. A comparison of the english and vietnamese translation of romeo. Study of nidas formal and dynamic equivalence and newmark.
Dynamic equivalency posted on march 29, 2011 by aliveintheword one of the first decisions to be made when translating written work from one language to another is whether to translate literally wordforword or to translate thoughtforthought. Dec 22, 2012 equivalence in translation introduction dynamic equivalence, as a respectable principle of translation, has been around in the translation sector for a long time. Although this concept is defined in terms of the relations between source and target texts by some scholars such as nida and jacobson, there are also some scholars, such as. Eugene nida 19142011 principles of correspondence 1964 keywords. The term equivalence points to the right amount of formal correspondence, and dynamic relates the communication process to the intake capacity. Feasibility of applying functional equivalence theory to. Functional equivalencetheory, put forward by eugene nida, well embodies the spirit of functionalism. Although distinguishing formal and dynamic equivalence, nida.
His work and ideas had a lasting influence on many of the bibles on our bookshelvesand on the way that scholars today approach the task of translating scripture. Formal correspondence and dynamic equivalence nida argued that there are two different types of equivalence, namely formal equivalence which in the second edition by nida and taber 1982 is referred to as formal correspondence and dynamic equivalence. According to him, a gloss translation mostly typifies formal equivalence where form and content are reproduced as faithfully as possible and the tl reader is able to understand as much as he can of the customs. In this translation the translator is concerned with such correspondence as poetry to poetry, sentence to sentence, and concept to concept. By combining the three models described in section 3. Carson, the limits of dynamic equivalence in bible translation, notes on translation 121 oct 1987 1, hails the triumph of dynamic equivalence in these words. Dynamic equivalence in practice an interaction with e. The reason for his substitution dynamic equivalence with. In dynamic equivalence translations, translators attempt to translate the messagemeaning of the originallanguage texts into an equivalent english word or expression. Jun 29, 2011 this post is me stating that i reject dynamic equivalence translation theory because of the logical outcomes of the method.
Translation, dynamic equivalence, formal equivalence, directional equivalence, natural equivalence. Dynamic and formal equivalence simple english wikipedia. Pdf eugene nida and translation ernst wendland dynamic equivalence and formal equivalence, terms coined by eugene nida, are two dissimilar translation approaches, achieving differing level of literalness between the source text and the target text, as employed in biblical translation. Pdf equivalence has been a critical issue in translation, as well as in legal. Nida has merely given new namesdynamic versus formal equivalenceto an old. Nidas definitions of formal and dynamic equivalence in 1964 consider cultural implications for translation. The terms dynamic equivalence and formal equivalence, coined by eugene nida, are associated with two dissimilar translation approaches that are employed to achieve different levels of literalness between the source text and the target text, as evidenced in biblical translation the two have been understood basically, with dynamic equivalence as senseforsense translation translating the. The reader of the manual may get the impression that there are no linguistic. The terms dynamic equivalence and formal equivalence mask the fact that at least two distinct theoretical issues separate most translations. Basically, dynamic equivalence has been described in terms of functional equivalence. His translation theory has exerted greatinfluence translationstudies westerncountries. Even though the two issues are not the same, they are related, and we find the.
A textual equivalent which is different from the formal correspondent of the source language item a nonobligatory lexical or grammatical change that occurs in the move from source to target text both a and b. The method bothers me because god inspired the biblical authors to write certain words, and translations can only be identified as the word of god insofar as they faithfully represent the. The concept of equivalence in translation studies the concept of equivalence, which has an important role in translation studies, is a broad concept. It is the method whereby the translators purpose is not to give a literal, wordforword rendition but to transfer the meaning of the text as would be best expressed in the words of the receptor native language. Translation and equivalence translation is broadly defined as the rendering of a message or. Their purpose is to enable the receptors to understand the implications of the cognitive content or to make a corresponding emotive response without recourse to the original text. Such a universalist stance can combine either with formal. Study of nida s formal and dynamic equivalence and.
796 1519 755 1196 360 520 1309 569 676 699 481 500 697 778 838 465 26 1361 1327 109 1515 1182 1008 1170 1073 1551 420 1022 334 264 1325 1032 175 347 1169 410 1252 422 574